AI Code Review & Quality Software
Continue
Continue runs source-controlled pull request checks
- SF Score
- 8.2/10
- Pricing
- From $3/mo
Compare tools
2 of 4 tools selected
AI Coding Assistant Software
Sourcegraph Cody
Sourcegraph Cody answers codebase context questions
- SF Score
- 8.2/10
- Pricing
- Contact sales
Add third toolCompare up to 4 side by side
Compare features, strengths, trade-offs, and best-fit use cases.
Comparing
At a glance
The short version
The facts each tool publishes, lined up so you can scan down a column. Anything the catalog does not establish is marked as such rather than counted against the tool.
Continue
- SF Score
- 8.2 / 10
- Starts at
- $3/mo
- Free plan
- Not offered
- Category
- AI Development & Coding Software › AI Code Review & Quality Software
Sourcegraph Cody
- SF Score
- 8.2 / 10
- Starts at
- Not established
- Free plan
- Not offered
- Category
- AI Development & Coding Software › AI Coding Assistant Software
Key differences
Where these tools actually diverge
The decision dimensions that separate this set, with each tool's own position stated plainly. No winner is declared — fit depends on your workflow.
Positioned for
Continue
AI Code Review & Quality Software
Sourcegraph Cody
AI Coding Assistant Software
Pricing model
Continue
From $3/mo
Sourcegraph Cody
Contact sales
SoftFinders Score
Continue
8.2 / 10
Sourcegraph Cody
8.2 / 10
Feature comparison
Capability matrix
Grouped by area. Every state carries a word as well as a colour, and anything the catalog has not established stays neutral rather than counting as a missing feature.
2 rows differ 3 identical
| Capability | | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| SF Score | 8.2 / 10Value | 8.2 / 10Value |
| Pricing model | PaidValue | CustomValue |
| Starts at | $3/moValue | Not established |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Category | AI Development & Coding Software › AI Code Review & Quality SoftwareValue | AI Development & Coding Software › AI Coding Assistant SoftwareValue |
Scroll the matrix sideways to see every column.
Listed by one tool only
13 capabilities are published by a single tool in this set. That does not mean the others lack them — only that the catalog has not established an answer either way.
- Policy ReviewsEnforces team standards through human-approved AI checks
- Suggested DiffsProposes fixes when checks detect reviewable issues
- Model ChoiceLets teams configure models per workflow requirement
- Continue CLIRuns interactive and headless terminal coding sessions
- AI ChecksRuns source-controlled agents on pull request changes
- Shared AgentsStores review logic inside repositories for reuse
- CI IntegrationSurfaces results as GitHub status checks automatically
- Code SearchConnects answers with Sourcegraph code intelligence context
- Repository AnswersExplains symbols dependencies and usage patterns quickly
- Enterprise ContextHandles large monorepos with platform scale controls
- IDE AssistanceSupports editors while using remote codebase knowledge
- Change UnderstandingHelps trace impact across shared repository graphs
- Governance FitWorks best inside managed Sourcegraph deployments environments
Use cases
What each tool is built for
The workflows each tool publishes for itself. Cards appear only for tools that list use cases.
Continue
- Pull Request Checks
- Engineering Standards Enforcement
- Suggested Fix Review
- CI Quality Gates
- Shared Agent Governance
+4 more on the Continue profile
Sourcegraph Cody
- Large Codebase Search
- Symbol Trace Work
- Enterprise Onboarding Help
- Impact Analysis Support
- Repository Knowledge Work
+1 more on the Sourcegraph Cody profile
Pros & cons
Strengths and compromises
Each tool's published strengths and the compromises that come with them, as supplied — not scored or ranked against each other. Longer lists fold; nothing is left out.
Continue
Pros
- Repository stored checks support team governance
- AI review rules remain version controlled
- Useful for repeatable pull request standards
- Apache 2.0 source remains freely available
- Supports VS Code, JetBrains, and CLI
- Supports many hosted and local providers
Cons
- Primary focus shifted toward PR checks
- Teams must maintain repository check rules
- Coding assistant expectations may need resetting
- Repository is no longer actively maintained
- Repository is read-only for contributors
- JetBrains plugin is not recommended path
- PR Checks were removed from documentation
Sourcegraph Cody
Pros
- Excellent for large codebase understanding work
- Search context strengthens answers across repositories
- Enterprise controls fit scaled engineering organizations
Cons
- Best value depends on Sourcegraph adoption
- Enterprise pricing requires direct sales conversations
- Smaller repositories may not justify complexity
Pricing
What each one costs
Published pricing signals only. Where a tool has not established a price, that is what it says — never a zero and never "free".
Continue
- Model
- Paid
Usage Based
See full pricingSourcegraph Cody
- Model
- Custom
Contact Sales
See full pricingNext step
Ready to try one?
A matrix narrows the field; a free trial settles it. Open whichever tool fits your workflow best, or start a different comparison.
Compare another set of tools