SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON

CompareeMaintvsUpKeep

Review features, pricing signals, strengths, and trade-offs before choosing.

Generated from current catalog profiles Catalog profile signals Use-case comparison
AI CMMS Software

UpKeep

SF 8.4

Mobile CMMS for maintenance teams

Free · PaidFree starter plan; paid plans per technician per month

Quick decision guide

Choose based on your workflow

eMaint may fit better if...

  • Custom Workflows
  • Asset Management
  • Condition Monitoring

UpKeep may fit better if...

  • Mobile App
  • Asset Tracking
  • Parts Inventory

Overview

How each tool is described

eMaint

What is eMaint?


eMaint is a CMMS and enterprise asset management platform from Fluke Reliability for managing work orders, preventive maintenance, assets, spare parts, condition monitoring, reporting, and maintenance workflows. Its close integration with Fluke condition-monitoring technology connects maintenance execution with equipment-health data.


  1. Maintenance workflow: teams can schedule preventive maintenance by time, meter readings, or equipment condition; track asset histories and downtime; manage spare-parts inventory; and complete work orders through a mobile app with offline support. Condition-based alarms can automatically generate maintenance work when defined thresholds are crossed.
  2. Predictive capabilities: eMaint connects with Fluke vibration sensors and can ingest condition data from SCADA, PLC, and BAS/BMS systems. Its condition-monitoring software detects vibration faults and uses AI-assisted diagnostics to analyze more than 1,600 fault-factor combinations and provide prioritized, plain-language maintenance recommendations. Sensor alarms can then trigger prioritized eMaint work orders.
  3. Implementation checks: buyers should assess asset hierarchies, preventive and corrective maintenance processes, inventory structure, Fluke or third-party sensor connectivity, ERP and SCADA integration, regulatory requirements, and whether maintenance standards need to be governed across multiple sites.
  4. Commercial considerations: Professional has a three-user minimum and includes condition-based maintenance, real-time condition monitoring, advanced reporting, workflow automation, and offline mobile access. Enterprise has a five-user minimum and adds global multi-site and inventory management, SSO, API access, ERP/BI/SCADA integrations, prebuilt connectors, and access to the eMaint AI Suite.


eMaint is particularly relevant to maintenance organizations that want CMMS execution closely connected with condition monitoring, predictive maintenance, and Fluke’s broader reliability ecosystem.

View full eMaint profile

UpKeep

What is UpKeep?


UpKeep is a mobile-first CMMS and asset operations platform for maintenance and reliability teams. It combines work orders, preventive maintenance, asset records, parts and inventory, inspections, analytics, and AI-assisted maintenance workflows in one system designed for both technicians in the field and maintenance managers.


  1. Maintenance workflow: Teams can create, prioritize, assign, and track work orders while maintaining equipment history, labor, parts, and costs. Preventive maintenance can run on recurring schedules or meter-based triggers such as runtime, mileage, or completed cycles, with UpKeep automatically generating work orders when configured conditions are reached.
  2. Mobile field work: Technicians can open and close jobs, add photos and notes, record labor and parts, capture readings, run checklists, and scan QR codes or barcodes to retrieve asset records from iOS and Android devices. Offline mode caches assigned work, asset information, and procedures and synchronizes changes after connectivity returns, although offline capability is reserved for Professional and Enterprise plans.
  3. AI-assisted maintenance: UpKeep's current AI offering combines Nova, Intelligence, and Nova Apps. Nova can answer questions from live maintenance records, run recurring checks through Pulse, draft work orders, perform data audits and bulk updates, and surface findings for review. Embedded Intelligence features available on Premium and higher tiers include Smart Scheduler, Voice Fill, Smart Checklist Builder, Photo-to-Part Creation, and AI-generated work-order summaries. UpKeep states that AI-generated decisions and drafts requiring action are surfaced for human review and approval rather than silently posting changes.
  4. Plans and scaling: Current CMMS pricing starts at $24 per user/month for Essential and $55 per user/month for Premium, while Professional and Enterprise use custom pricing. Premium adds preventive-maintenance scheduling, inventory, costing, and embedded AI features; Professional adds offline mobile operation and deeper asset analytics; Enterprise adds multi-site management, workflow automation, APIs and custom integrations, SSO, custom roles, and governance capabilities.


UpKeep is most relevant to maintenance organizations trying to replace paper, spreadsheets, and disconnected maintenance records with a system technicians can update directly at the asset. Its value depends on technician adoption, maintenance complexity, asset coverage, required integrations, and whether better field data and automated workflows improve preventive-maintenance execution and equipment reliability.


View full UpKeep profile

Side-by-side

Key differences

Criteria
AI CMMS SoftwareeMaint
AI CMMS SoftwareUpKeep
Best for
AI CMMS Software
AI CMMS Software
Score
8.5/10
8.4/10
Pricing
Contact sales
Free · Paid
Category / audience
AI Maintenance, CMMS & Asset Reliability Software › AI CMMS Software
  • cmms
  • preventive maintenance
  • condition monitoring
+2 more
AI Maintenance, CMMS & Asset Reliability Software › AI CMMS Software
  • cmms
  • mobile maintenance
  • work orders
+2 more

OVERLAP

Where eMaint and UpKeep are similar

Both tools cover similar catalog signals. The deciding factor is usually workflow fit, implementation needs, and ecosystem fit.

1 capabilities0 workflows

Shared capabilities

Capability overlap

  • Work OrdersPlan track and report on maintenance jobs

Feature check

Side-by-side feature check

Feature
eMaint
UpKeep
Custom WorkflowsConfigurable forms screens and approvals
-
Asset ManagementDetailed asset records and history tracking
-
Condition MonitoringConnects with Fluke sensors and alerts
-
Inventory ControlManage parts and tools across sites
-
Reports BuilderCustom reports for compliance and reliability
-
Mobile AppTechnicians work from phone or tablet
-
11 capabilities compared.10 differentiating rows are shown first.

Use cases

Who they're built for

eMaint

  • Tailor CMMS to processesConfigure forms screens and workflows to match operations
  • Run multi-site maintenance programsManage work orders and PM across many plants
  • Connect Fluke condition monitoringUse vibration and thermal data inside CMMS workflows
View full eMaint profile

UpKeep

  • Replace paper work order booksDigitize maintenance jobs and shift handovers across sites
  • Track facility maintenance tasksManage repairs and PM across buildings and offices
  • Run preventive maintenance schedulesSet recurring jobs on equipment to reduce breakdowns
View full UpKeep profile

The trade-offs

Pros & cons of each tool

Trade-offs

eMaint

Pros
  • Highly configurable for complex maintenance processes
  • Native integration with Fluke condition monitoring tools
  • Strong reporting suite for reliability programs
Cons
  • Setup takes time for highly configured environments
  • Pricing typically quote based and not transparent
  • Advanced analytics may need external BI tools
Trade-offs

UpKeep

Pros
  • Mobile app makes technician adoption fairly simple
  • Quick rollout for small maintenance teams
  • Solid coverage of core CMMS features
Cons
  • Reporting depth is limited for complex sites
  • Some useful features sit on higher tiers
  • Less suitable for heavy enterprise asset programs

Final verdict

Best fit depends on your workflow

Catalog verdict · low confidence

Current catalog data shows meaningful overlap between eMaint and UpKeep. Use the signals below to decide based on workflow, ecosystem, pricing, and implementation fit.

Shared catalog overlap

eMaint and UpKeep share 1 catalog signal, so the decision should focus on fit rather than broad capability alone.

Differentiators available

eMaint has 4 visible decision signals and UpKeep has 4.

Score signal

eMaint has the higher SoftFinders Score in the current catalog data.

TRY THEM YOURSELF

See which one fits your workflow

Both tools have their strengths, the best way to decide is to spend a few minutes inside each.