AI Revenue Management System
Pace
SF 8.0Legacy automated revenue platform for hotels
Contact sales
AI Hotel Business Intelligence
M3
SF 8.4Hotel accounting and financial BI platform
Contact sales
Quick decision guide
Choose based on your workflow
Pace may fit better if...
- Automated Pricing
- Revenue Forecasts
- Pickup Monitoring
M3 may fit better if...
- Hotel Accounting
- Portfolio Reporting
- Labor Insights
Overview
How each tool is described
Pace
What is Pace?
Pace Revenue was acquired by FLYR in September 2022 and its hotel revenue-management technology now operates as FLYR Hospitality. The current platform is an AI-first revenue strategy system for hotels and accommodation businesses, organized around Optimize, Insights, Planning, and Groups.
- Revenue optimization: Optimize generates hourly pricing and inventory-restriction recommendations using demand forecasting and price-sensitivity models. Hotels can run recommendations manually or automate their application, while revenue managers influence the AI through strategic directions rather than maintaining large sets of fixed business rules.
- Commercial intelligence: Insights centralizes PMS, rate-shopper, benchmarking, and other commercial data with transactional-level analysis, customizable dashboards, scheduled reports, custom metrics, and natural-language AI queries. It is designed to give revenue and commercial teams a common data layer for investigating performance measures such as pickup, occupancy, ADR, and RevPAR.
- Planning and group business: Planning supports rolling and locked forecasts, AI-generated baseline forecasts, versioning, forecast-accuracy tracking, scenario comparisons across periods and budgets, and structured approval workflows. Groups extends optimization to transient, corporate, and group demand with real-time displacement analysis, inventory allocation, rate recommendations, pickup and wash tracking, and forecast impact before a group is accepted.
- Integration ecosystem: FLYR Hospitality currently lists 26 integrations across PMS, CRS, intelligence, and marketing systems. Featured connections include Mews, Oracle OPERA Cloud, Cloudbeds, Apaleo, Stayntouch, CoStar STR, Amadeus Demand360, and RateGain, allowing its pricing, forecasting, and analytics workflows to use data from the hotel’s existing commercial technology stack.
FLYR Hospitality is most relevant to hotels and multi-property groups that want revenue optimization, business intelligence, forecasting, and group-business decisions operating from the same data and AI platform rather than separate RMS, BI, and spreadsheet workflows.
M3
What is M3?
M3 is a hospitality financial management system built specifically for hotel owners, operators, and management companies. It combines hotel accounting, labor management, business intelligence, outsourced accounting services, and integrations that connect financial data with property, point-of-sale, payroll, banking, and other hotel systems.
- Hotel accounting: Accounting Core is M3’s enterprise accounting product, with multi-property general ledgers, intercompany transactions, accounts payable, automated journal entries and reconciliations, payments, budgeting, financial reporting, and PMS data processing. CoreSelect is the streamlined alternative for independent and growing portfolios of roughly 2–30 properties, adding automated daily revenue imports, invoice processing, bank reconciliation, payments, and portfolio reporting.
- Business intelligence: Insight combines data from Accounting Core, Labor Management, PMS, guest-satisfaction, STR, and on-the-books sources into customizable dashboards. Hotels can track revenue, expenses, occupancy, NOI, labor costs, budget variance, and property or portfolio performance, while built-in budgeting, forecasting, and formula-building tools support forward planning and custom hospitality KPIs.
- Labor and connected data: Labor Management tracks hours, wages, staffing, productivity, and schedules against forecast demand and budgets, with labor information flowing into Accounting Core and payroll systems. Accounting Core currently advertises integrations with 70+ PMS, POS, and payroll providers, while M3’s wider integration ecosystem includes systems such as Oracle OPERA, Mews, Cloudbeds, ADP, Paychex, Paylocity, and financial/payment partners.
- Commercial structure: M3 is modular rather than sold as one mandatory bundle. Buyers can select Accounting Core or CoreSelect and add Labor Management, Insight, and hospitality accounting services as needed. M3 does not publish a standard rate card for its main software portfolio; sales are primarily demo- and quote-led, while outsourced accounting can range from targeted assistance to ongoing or full-cycle accounting engagements.
M3 is most relevant to hotel owners and management companies that want hospitality-specific accounting and portfolio reporting connected directly to hotel operational data rather than adapting a general-purpose accounting package.
Side-by-side
Key differences
Criteria
AI Revenue Management SystemPace
AI Hotel Business IntelligenceM3
Best for
AI Revenue Management System
AI Hotel Business Intelligence
Score
8.0/10
8.4/10
Pricing
Contact sales
Contact sales
Category / audience
AI Hotel Management & Operations Software › AI Revenue Management System
- dynamic pricing
- hotel revenue management
- automated pricing
AI Hotel Management & Operations Software › AI Hotel Business Intelligence
- hotel accounting
- hospitality BI
- financial reporting
Feature check
Side-by-side feature check
Feature
Pace
M3
Automated PricingSuggests rates from demand and pickup
-
Revenue ForecastsTracks forecast shifts across hotel segments
-
Pickup MonitoringShows booking pace changes for managers
-
Dashboard ReportingSummarizes performance without spreadsheet-heavy work
-
Rate ControlsSupports overrides for pricing confidence clearly
-
FLYR TransitionCurrent packaging needs vendor confirmation clearly
-
12 capabilities compared.12 differentiating rows are shown first.
Use cases
Who they're built for
Pace
- Automate independent hotel revenue pricingReduce manual pricing work for smaller revenue teams
- Compare legacy Pace with FLYRUnderstand older Pace positioning before current FLYR evaluation
- Review pickup and demand trendsTrack booking pace changes before rate decisions for hotel teams
M3
- Standardize hotel portfolio financial reportingUnify accounting and reporting across hotel properties for hotel teams
- Track property-level operating performanceReview revenue, expenses, and profitability by property for hotel teams
- Support hotel management company financeGive operators consistent finance data across portfolios for hotel teams
The trade-offs
Pros & cons of each tool
Trade-offs
Pace
Pros
- Clear automation story for lean hotel teams
- Useful history for FLYR Hospitality comparisons clearly
- Pricing guidance can reduce manual spreadsheet work
Cons
- Standalone product status needs careful vendor confirmation
- Current packaging appears folded into FLYR Hospitality
- Less suitable than active current FLYR listing
Trade-offs
M3
Pros
- Deep hotel accounting focus supports finance teams
- Useful portfolio reporting for management companies clearly
- Hospitality standards fit better than generic accounting
Cons
- Implementation needs careful finance workflow mapping clearly
- Small single-property hotels may find it heavy
- AI features are less visible than BI depth
Final verdict
Best fit depends on your workflow
Current catalog data shows meaningful overlap between Pace and M3. Use the signals below to decide based on workflow, ecosystem, pricing, and implementation fit.
Differentiators available
Pace has 4 visible decision signals and M3 has 4.
Score signal
M3 has the higher SoftFinders Score in the current catalog data.
Choose Pace if…
- Automate independent hotel revenue pricing
- Compare legacy Pace with FLYR
- Review pickup and demand trends
- Automated Pricing
Choose M3 if…
- Standardize hotel portfolio financial reporting
- Track property-level operating performance
- Support hotel management company finance
- Hotel Accounting